My last blog was about Pat Derby, co-founder of PAWS in California, and critics against her poor competence as animal trainer, her
total lack of welfare for animals etc during her years as "trainer".
I found an interesting link on Circus Fans Association of America where you can read, among other things regarding Animal Rights Activists and PAWS: "Derby
rarely mentions how in her days as a trainer and operator of a roadside
zoo in Buellton , CA, an elephant in her care died in a barn fire."
The last line, about Neena surprised me, because for sure, it seems
really like Mrs
Derby doesnt want to speak about this elephant Neena. Searching through PAWS documents, and googling, it was like Neena hadnt existed, which is very rare, normally, an elephant owners first elephant is like the first love. But thanks to Mr Ryan Easley, who help me with lot of american elephants
records in my database, and Mr Robert Cline, a circus historian who has
generously shared with me his records, I already had Neena in my database.
Neena arrived Big Johns circus in 1962 and was bought by Ted Derby in
1970, when Ted and Pat Derby stayed at a place refered to as Buellton
Wild Animal Park and sometimes called Andersens zoo, in Buellton.
The article animal stunts tells about how Pat Derby rode Neena, through the ceremonial opening ribbon at
the San Diego Wild Animal Park in 1972 and later gave talks about her animals to
zoo visitors.
More traces of Neena is to be find on Circus Report from 24 of July 1978: which tells about Big John Strong Circus in Cincinnatti, Ohio, and "Chris Burell and Neena the elephant". This circus report also mentions: "Pat Derby, animal trainer and author of the book the lady and her tiger, has moved her animals to "Howling Wolf Lodge" at Legget, California. Later, I understood from Robert Cline, that Big John Strong Circus had three different elephants, all called Neena. Ted Derbys Neena was number 2 on Big John Strong Circus, while the mentioned Chris Burell and Neena the elephant seems to have been Neena number 3.
Obviously Neena 2 was used in the film Alabamas Ghost, released 1973.You can read the most interesting intrigue from the film Alabamas Ghost here, and also the lines Neena the Elephant as well as:
The article Open wide, elephant caretaker published in August 13,
1977, shows Nina, when she was housed at Pat
Derbys famous wild animals in Earl Laursens farm, Pomeroy Road, Nipomo
Mesa, Santa Ynez Valley in Californa. and Ray Ryan, who started to
work for Pat Derby in 1976. In 1981, Ryan went to San Diego State to get
a degree in Psychology, and worked at with African elephants at
the San Diego Wild Animal Park until 1988. Since 2010 Ray Ryan work at Kerulos
center, which I emailed, asking to get in contact with Mr Ryan. I never had an answer, seems he dont want to speak about Neena. (More about Ray Ryan at Kerulos Center.)
After 1977 Internet does not give any more glimpses of Neena that I succeeded to find. But after Pat Derby and Ed Stewart moved to Legget, California, she seems to have been housed there, on Howling Wolf Lodge and Wild Animal Sanctuary where Neena is supposed to have died, in a barn fire, in February 1982.
At least two
persons with direct connections to Neena has confirmed that this was
the case.
But Pat Derby and Ed Stewart never mentioned her death anywhere,
and it seems they forgot they owned her? How can you forget that you owned an elephant 1970-1982, which died in a barn fire?
It seems to me that Pat Derby was rather trying to hide the facts about Neenas death. Why? It must be a terrible experience if your elephant dies in a barn fire, and the only page with a connection to PAWS, where I have seen Neenas name mentioned is a pdf document titled tributes, where Brian Busta, ARK 2000 Sanctuary Manager/Senior Elephant Keeper mention her, together with the other Asian elephants..
Who, or what started the barnfire where the elephant died, and why has Neenas name been hidden throughout PAWS history?
6th of May 2013 I posted a question on PAWS Facebook page, asking: You write "Every elephant has a story, and we are part of that story." What is Neenas story? adding a link to the page I did about Neena in my database. Noone answered my question on PAWS Facebook page, and within 24 hours it was deleted by PAWS. Please continue to ask them what happened to Neena on PAWS Facebook.
It seems that Earnie Brnscomb, volunteer fireman since 1973 in Legget have some knowledge about the barnfire in Legget 1982, so I have written an email to him to get more details about the fire.
Meanwhile, the traces I have found on Internet, are from people who gives indication of anger regarding the death, as if they blame Pat Derby. Is this why Derby was qiet about Neena?
"The circus also had three elephants at different times named Neena. The Neena my dad worked with retired and went to
Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) who claimed that they
"rescued" Neena. Pat Derby who took Neena wrote in her book, A Lady and
Her Tiger, about the tricks that Neena did because Neena "wanted to"
and not because she had to. Pat seemed clueless that Neena was trained
to do those things because she wanted to learn them. Neena would do her
act even when her handler was not in the ring. My dad wanted
to visit Neena because she lived nearby, but she died in a fire at PAWS.
The people who claimed to "rescue" Neena, killed her with negligence."
My dad
wanted to visit Neena because she lived nearby, but she died in a fire
at PAWS. The people who claimed to "rescue" Neena, killed her with
negligence.
The articleAnimal rights activist Pat Derby dies at 70 says "Derby was known to have a special affection for the elephants, at times sleeping in the animals’ barn to be near them."
In my last blog about Pat Derby, co-founder of PAWS in California, Jan Giacinto, Exotic Animals in Santa Rita, discusses her drinking habits: "Pat bragged about how the agency sent her cases of wine. That was her
favourite drink, and she would have her glass in around ten in the
morning. I have seen her drink wine while working on the commercial with
fullgrown cougars."
If Pat Derby was drinking a lot of wine during the early eighties, and was at times sleeping in Neenas barn, is it possible that Pat Derby also was a smoker, and that she accidently started the fire that killed Neena?
Is this why people who knew Neena are so upset?Who can tell more about what happened to Neena?
At Last Chance For Animals in Los Angeles you can request investigation regarding Neenas death.
In my previous blog I told about that Pat Derby / PAWS threatens to sue me. (In 2002, PAWS spent $67,000 in legal fees, according to its income tax return. Money from kind people who gave her donations, believing that all the money went to her animals.) It so happened that Mrs Derby passed away in February 2013, and I have not heard anything more from her lawyers.
During an interview, Pat Derby said that: "she is convinced that
“speech killed us, because the first thing we learn to speak we learn to
lie".
This may, in her case, be very true. In numerous interviews she says that she "that she developed her own training methods based on love and trust", but this seems to be wrong, according to other people.
I have documents (download here)
stating Pat Derbys poor competence as animal trainer, critizising her
total lack of welfare for animals in her posession, as well as privately
taking money away from shared bank accounts with other persons os
companies, which you can read further down, and at the bottom of the page you find links and sources mentioned, but lets begin with an introducation:
Pat Derby
Pat Derby, (June 7, 1942 - February 15, 2013) born Patricia Bysshe Shelley in Sussex, England, met the animal trainer Theodore Ralph Ball (alias Ted Derby, Pat convinced him to take his mothers maiden name Derby, as stage name) in 1964, who supplied trained animals for animals for the movies, in a San Francisco nightclub in the mid-’60s. They married, and settled in Placerita Canyon in Newhall, north of Los Angeles.
Here they faced protests from neighbors, because of the animals, why they, and their animals, moved to Buellton, where the business gradually changed from animals trained for movies, to an animal shelter, sometimes reaching about 200 animals.
Be sure to read the poster below!!
On Internet I found the following: "The Andersen Animal Farm, behind Pea Soup Andersen’s, had exotic animals and a train for children to ride. It was operated for two years in the early 1970s by former Pea Soup Andersen’s owner Vince Evans, who died in a plane crash."
"The business thrived under Evans' hand. By then the restaurant was purchasing 50 tons of peas each year, enough for three-quarters of a million bowls of soup! He built an aviary and filled it with parrots, he installed a train for children to ride that went from the restaurant to the area where the motel now stands, and even had a miniature wild animal park for two years. The park was discontinued in 1970 to make way for the addition of a Danish style motel in 1970."
The couple divorced in the mid-1970s, and Ted Derby took some 30 animals to his new place in Tehachapi.
On the morning of April 12, 1976. Derby was fatally shot by adjacent landowner Jack Coyne, 63. (Theodore Ralph Ball (alias Ted Derby) is buried in the Santa Barbara Cemetery. He was born 9/3/34 in New York, and died 4/12/76 in Bakersfield, CA
according to the cemetery records.)
Ted Derby was shot by a neighbour while stealing cattle, and the man who shot him was acquitted, according to Ronald L. Oxley, Action Animals, Acton, California.
In the same year, 1976 Pat Derby met Ed Stewart.
From the article Open Wide: Santa Barbara County officials asked Ms. Derby to move her animals out
after some Santa Ynez Valley ranchers complained the wild animal noises
were disturbing their livestock, according to a Santa Barbara County
Planning Department spokesman.He added that Ms. Derby located the animals there without proper permits
and then didn’t follow through on applications for a conditional use
permit. He said the Santa Barbara County district attorney gave her
several extensions on the permit time limit, before he ordered her to
remove the animals.
Read more here: http://sloblogs.thetribunenews.com/slovault/2010/06/open-wide-elephant-caretaker/#storylink=cpy
Since March 1977 the animals were housed at Earl Laursens farm in Nipomo Mesa, Santa Ynez Valley, California, according to the article Open Wide, where Pat Derby says that "Most of the animals are defanged or declawed".
Read more here: http://sloblogs.thetribunenews.com/slovault/2010/06/open-wide-elephant-caretaker/#storylink=cpy
Elephant Neena and caretaker Ray Ryan, who went to work for Ms. Derby in Nipomo Mesa after she and her cougar appeared at an auto show in Chicago, his hometown.
Read more here: http://sloblogs.thetribunenews.com/slovault/2010/06/open-wide-elephant-caretaker/#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://sloblogs.thetribunenews.com/slovault/2010/06/open-wide-elephant-caretaker/#storylink=cp
1978 they opened Howling Wolf Lodge and Wild AnimalSanctuary in Leggett, California.In february 1982 the elephant Neena seems to have died in a barn fire, during Pat Derbys care. More about this on next blog. (Anyone who has detailed information about Neenas death, please send it to me.)
Pat Derby’s Famous Wild Animals – Leggett, CA
In 1984, Pat and Ed founded the Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) and Ed Stewart, the former car man, is currently director of Sanctuary Operations for PAWS’ three sanctuaries and serves as PAWS animal care manager. Ed Stewart recently wrote an article titled: No Ethical Way to Keep Elephants in Captivity, where he states that "I have more than 32 years of experience caring for elephants, both Asian
and African, including raising calves and managing dangerous bull
elephants. My partner, and PAWS’ co-founder, Pat Derby, had more than 38
years of experience working with elephants. ", and in the same article he appearently can look into the future when he says: "The inadequacies for elephants in captivity will always be a source of disease and suffering for elephants", but he forgots to mention why only a few percent of captive elephants are suffering from diseases now, today. The former car man doesnt go into any details why he claim to be an elephant specialist. But when speaking about his experience with "raising calves and managing dangerous bull
elephants" he seem to forget that PAWS has no breeding, no calfs were born there, and both their bulls are castrated.
So what about Pat Derbys claimed 38
years of experience working with elephants?
It seems actually that Ted Derby bought their first elephant Neena 43
years ago, in 1970, and Ted died 37 years ago, in 1976, which gives me
the indication that Pat started to take care of Neena after Teds death,
until Neena appearently died in flames in the barnfire six years later, in 1982.
Ed Stewart says he has over 32 years experience with elephants. 2013-32 = 1981, one year before Neena died. After this Pat Derby and Ed Stewart didnt had any elephants, until 71 arrived in 1986.
Signed statements from people who knew Pat Derby:
Ronald L. Oxley, Action Animals, Acton, California writes 1984:
This
letter in response to a letter I received from PAWS announcing the formation
of their new organization. I have relevant, important comments to make concerning
Pat Derby who I suspect is in collusion with Ms. Sue Pressum in the
formation of PAWS.
Mrs. Derby claim to have been an animal trainer for 20 years, while in fact her
and he: late husband's short independent career as "trainers" lasted
from 5-7 years. During this short career they were guilty of severe animal
abuse at their own hand.. They maintained animals under the most abusive and cruelest of circumstances.
Among their more notable achievements was time constant tranquilization of mammals,
on the set of the filming of the Lassie series. The Derbys could not train their
animals so they attempted to tranquilize animals as an alternative (substitute)
for their obligation to provide the show with trained wild animals. One particular incident included the sedation
of a cougar which was placed in a corral with a horse. The horse became
excited, kicked the cougar in the head, and killed it. Subsequently the camera operator
(who can attest to this event) refused to film the Derbys' attempts to later
utilize tranquilized wolves.
While working on cougar commercial on location in the Valley of Fire in Nevada the
Derbys allowed one of their cheetahs to die of heat stroke. I can proof this event
with hard evidence.
Pat Derbys book Lady and the tiger
The Derbys' animals were never trained or conditioned to perform in motion
pictures and it was pure cruelty on their part for them to even “perform” in moving
pictures; just to take their animals on the set was a severe stress on their
animals.
After their
separation Pat Derby could not get a job with her animals so she had a veterinarian
euthanize the animals Ted Derby wouldn’t take and those to which she had no personal
attachment. This is a most disgusting and disgraceful act. A friend and colleague
of mine witnessed these animals being scooped up by a tractor shovel and heaped
in a pile in the back of a pickup truck.
(On the picture to the right, you can read about when Pat Derby describes how she was killing animals the whole day.)
As an illustration of the character, ethics and morals of Ted Derby it is a matter
of fact that he was killed while stealing cattle from a neighboring farmer. He
had been, warned against rustling cattle prior to being shot for doing so.
The man who shot him was acquitted.
My personal, well-founded feelings are that Pat Derby is a frustrated
individual who is too lazy to find and/or create a meaningful career; she is
therefore praying upon the emotions of an uniformed, innocent public by seeking
donations to support P.A.W.S. She solicits many under the guise of animal
humanity for her own personal needs so she can live “high on the hog” I
recently watched her on television being interviewed in the company of a bear which, she claimed
had been abused by an animal trainer. Who was this trainer? She was publically denouncing
"trainers" with no specifics; a rather irresponsible act. She was crying
during the interview- l wonder if she ever cries at night over thecases of neglect, outright: abuse and cruelty
of which she was guilty?
Pat Derby should've been an actress because she has convinced so many people that she was animal trainer. I am convinced that she did not seek an acting career for the same reasons she is not animal trainer. Animal trainers work 12-16 hour days, seven days a week and should spend 75% of their income on cages, feed, animal transportation and property on which to maintain their animals. Animal trainers can ill afford to travel around the country collecting money and fabricating stories about the abuse of motion picture animals.
The few professional animal trainers involved in supplying animals to the TV and Motion Picture Industry are quality people who take excellent care of their animals. On a purely economic basis it is hardly in their best interest to abuse their animals.
I have always considered my ownership of animals a privilege and not a burden. My career as a Professional trainer has always been secondary to the health, welfare, and day-to-day care of my animals. I am proud and outspoken en ray love for animals. Pat Derby for years has written articles full of distortions and lies; she has given TV. interviews which are full of fabricated stories about animals, animal trainers, animal abuse, animal training, animal handling and animal care.
I am in favor of well meaning, highly qualified humane organizations who legitimately seek public and private support and aid in the elimination of any form of cruelty to animals. I will continue to support these organizations such as the American Humane Association who are under contract by the Association of Motion Picture and Television Producers to police the use of animals on the set. There are other worthy organizations which I support who center their activities in the field, off the set.
Any humane group that allows Pat Derby to represent them and use her acting abilities to distract from, whatever accomplishments the organization could achieve is wreckless in its judgment and has in itself been deceived by a professional cheat and a liar. The organization's objectives, goals and potential for future progress should be re-evaluated - or the organization should be reorganized or disbanded until a legitimate, knowledgeable, honest representative can be found.
Personally, from this day hence I will continue to gather information, based upon witness testimonials to expose Pat Derby for what she really is - a fraud! Whether or not a class action suit, to cause Pat Derby to cease and desist in her activities is presently being discussed by interested parties in my area.
P.A.W.S, and Pat Derby are not welcomed by our industry and their sordid lies and deceit of the public will not be tolerated. I respectfully caution you to tread carefully in the future and evaluate your allegations in the light of the serious repercussions which may result from any further attempts at public deceit, slandering of professionals and disruption of an industry who has successfully policed itself and driven off the bad characters which Mrs. Derby claims to exist. There are few of us professionals who derive a living by supplying animals for use in the motion picture, TV and entertainment field - we are beyond repute and can withstand any challenges Mrs. Derby cares to present. This is especially true in the light of Mrs. Derby's character, morals, ethics, past history, state of the art knowledge of animals and her present attempts to bilk a well-meaning public out of --20.00 --25.00 --35.00 --50 or other $.
Mr. Ronald L. Oxley
Transcript from a letter from Animal Actors of Hollwood, from 1988:
"I have known Pat Derby since 1967. At that time Pat and her then husband Ted were subrenting space from Jungleland for their animals.
I was also familar with their training methods, or rather lack of them. On one occasion (The Red Skelton Show) I was present when they were asked to leave due to, in my opinion, embarrasingly bad performance and working style. Since Pat could not succeed as a movie trainer, she became an active member of the animal protection industry.
In 1975 she introduced Sue Pressman of the H.S.U.S. as a movie producer to Frank Inn, the late George Toth, Ron Oxley and myself, a missrepresentation to say the least. Among others Pressman requested we tie a wolf temporarily in the sun so that she could take a better picture of it for her upcoming movie. The resulting "Expose" appeared in that famous clarion of truth "The National Enquirer" claiming us as cruel trainers' tormenting the wolf in the biasing sun.
Just recently I have viewed a Canadian T.V. show "The Fifth Estate" where Pat Derby gave misleading, incorrect, and in my opinion hateful accusations against her former colleagues in the motion picture industry.
Her actions preclude any fair or unbiased treatment towards this group of highly qualified, severly controlled and supervised group of tax paying professionals. In my opinion to have Pat Derby on the Fish and Game Commission Board is an intolerable situation, and I recommend her immediate removal. ."
At your request, here is my statement about Pat Derby. I worked with her on several jobs. Quite a few years back I worked with her on the Cougar commercials. I supplied baby cougars on several jobs. Pat bragged about how the agency sent her cases of wine. That was her favorite drink and she would have her glass around ten in the morning. I have seen her drink wine while working on the commercial with full grown cougars.
Speaking of abuse to animals, if Pat Derby used to use abuse, and says she does not, why does she think that all other trainers use abuse and if they did in Pat's days, why can't they have changed like she says she is? I worked a cheetah commercial with her. I am the only trainer who had cheetahs; so many trainers used my animal. The cheetah is a very expensive animal and very docile. We worked a commercial where the cheetah had to run a distance from point A to point B for a car conical. We did this in the desert during the heat of the day. My cat did the run many times and was getting tired and I told Pat that the animal would have to rest, but she insisted that we try longer. She would not let me talk to the director to explain. She said that she knew how they worked. The cheetah was to run in a straight line to show speed. Then when the cheetah didn't run fast enough, the studio used a motorcycle to chase my cat with to get better speed. After a few tries my cheetah just curled up in a ball and would not run any farther. The animal was breathing very hard and was scared. I told Pat that was enough. I would not kill my animal for any job. My cat was worth more to me than having to work and die for a few dollars.
Then the location was moved over to another spot where there was a lot of very tall tumble weed, I told Pat to tell the director not to waste his time because my cat would not run through that stuff in a straight line and they would only waste a lot of time, but again she said she knew what she was doing and I told her that I would not let my animal run through the scene, and I did not.
Gardner McKay was also on this job with his cheetah, which never worked, but he said he would try the scene. His cat would not run so Pat tied a chicken to a piece of rope about 8 to 10 feet long and raised the rope above her head so the other cheetah could see it and spun the poor chicken around in circles over her head so the cheetah could see it and run in her direction. She tried this several times, but the cat would not come to the bait.
A chicken may be a chicken, but I thought that it was cruel thing to do. Also it was thoughtless to try to make any animal run through large tumble weeds. These things were higher than the cheetah and had prickly thorns on them. I could see my animal's feet get hurt or one of the thorns get in his eyes. On top of the many hours were wasted in placing a new set, when I knew in advance that my animal would not do it and I would not let him.
I hope this will help you a little. Sincerely, Jan Giacinto
Shirley Keith, 1989: "We found that Pat had opened a separate account,
under the non-profit name of orphans for the wild. with only her
signature required, and was divirting donations for her own use".
Sorry I was delayed for a short time. I started to continue with the narrative, but its too long - most of it is not pertinent. Some of the following might direct your effort in new directions. If you and your lawyer find anything that sounds hopeful, don’t hesitate to call on me.
1972 – Orphans of the Wild got off to a good start by April 1972. Another friend and I put in the money to get the non-profit account opened and we elected officers. I asked not to be included on the Board of Directors, but would continue as a volunteer. A friend of mine agreed to act as treasurer, and two business friends and advisers. ( I can give you her name, but she doesn’t remember much about those few weeks.)
She would handle donation income and outgo only with the understanding that her signature would have to appear on all transactions. It was so agreed. She emphasized she would do nothing to jeopardize her bonded integrity. She resigned when she found that Pat had opened a separate account under the non-profit name of orphans of the wild, with only her signature required and was diverting donations for her own use. (The only person that might have information is George Kalosky, then a vice president of that bank. He isn’t listed in the phone book, but I believe is still active here.)
At fund-raiser, Pat and Ted often took money from donation cans to buy lunch for the volunteers. Ted worried when I objected; they told me they’d replace it later. I don’t know if it was. At this time Pat instructed everyone that we were answerable only to her. That Ted had no part in running the ‘business’ except to put his name where she pointed.
Shortly thereafter we accidentally discovered that an official board had been elected without notice to the others who were continuing to give time and expertise - I can think only because Pat liked the prestige of some of them. They all left with very unpleasant feelings about the Derbys. Aside from resenting the extreme lack of courtesy to people who were giving up their time to help, I was pleased with the ‘real’ board. Foremost among them were General and Mrs. Pierpont–Morgan Hamilton. Besides their wealth, both were well known for their philanthropic work with animal welfare.
The Derbys promised to use their salaries as well as income from the Zoo, commercials, etc. to support orphanage expenses, build new cages and meet all the goals proclaimed, using income earned at Zoo, income from commercial - as well as all donations. The Hamiltons arranged to meet any financial shortfall, with particular emphasis on meeting mortgage obligations, when income was not sufficient to keep the organization afloat. (I discovered later that, unknown to Pat, they were responsible for convincing the San Diego Zoo to hire the Derbys to prevent wild animal shows, and guarantee their salary.)
During this time a couple who had co-signed a note toward purchase of farm equipment, came to me in distress. The note had come due and since the Derbys hadn’t paid out, they had been forced to meet the obligation. In spite of a family emergency had arisen, Pat had refused to meet them. They came to me after seeing Pat driving her new Jaguar (auto), while they were still driving their ancient BW to visit their son in the hospital. Although I had never met the people previously, Pats response was “Don’t bother me with your friends’ problems!” (They were never repaid. Their names may be somewhere in my files.)
By autumn, it was apparent to me and to Betty Hayes (who had been engaged as ranch manager) that no compound improvement was being done as promised to members and donors; that merchants were beginning to lose their patience and were dunning for payment of long overdue bills. Betty and I quit in August 1972.
In Spring 1973 while I was volunteering at our local zoo a very subdued Pat called me begging me to help. The Pierpont-Morgan Hamiltons were suing Orphans of the Wild, forcing them into bankruptcy. There was an emergency need for funds to prevent the animal from going to the block. (I think risking the welfare of animals by misuse of their support is cruelty!)
With the understanding I would merely write literature, answer fan letters, etc. as before, but have nothing to do with fund raising or other involvement in business, I agreed to help. The new organization was not tax deductible.
Besides generous donations, movies and television brought in some money; their training school brought in $1000 per student for a six week course. Most of the upkeep of the animals was done by students as part of the course. Beyond feeding the animals, nothing was spent on improving the compound. Ted finally filed for and received a divorce from Pat. She moved from the house but they continued as partners.
In mid-1974 Pat leased (using ‘her own money’) an ‘option to buy’ a large home in Sant Ynez Valley, about twelve miles from the compound. About three months later she and her boyfriend decided to purchase twenty acres and luxury home off Los Osos, and start a rival compound. She moved there, trying unsuccessfully to get Ted to take over her lease. He refused, and their partnership was dissolved. The Johnsons and Secretary Shirley Andberg (Solvang) continued on Pat salary; I continued to work for Ted gratis.
A lawsuit had been initiated against Pat by two students for requiring them to clean Pats house and small animal compound there. It was dropped when the students discovered that they could not sue Pat without suing Ted as well, who they felt blameless. (If this looks useful, I’ll try to find out their names.)
By October it was clear that the orphanage was going under. The final blow was foreclosure by the ranch owners who gave them until the beginning of 1975 to move themselves and the animals.
Ted and Pat moved to temporarily donated locations, each taking as many animals as they could manage to maintain. Homes were found for some. Three wolf cubs were born New Years Day (1975). That day, except for them, about seventeen unplaced animals (including a Kodiak bear, two Grizzly Bears, and the remaining wolves including the new mother) were put down by Pete Batten and buried in the hills behind the compound.
When Ted met Pat (about 1964) he was chief trainer for Ralph Helfer. Pat begged for and was given a job tending animals (by her own account in her book “Lady and Her Tiger” page 29 she states: At this point its important to talk about the way I was with animals in those days. In the first place, I didn’t know what they were. I loved them passionately and indiscriminately, but …. I had no slightest understanding of what it was that I loved nor of what such a love, to be real, must demand of me.”
Almost at once she began to want to start her own business with Ted as partner. When he refused, she waited until they were both guest of Bill Burrud on a radio show, at which time she publicly denounced Helfer and all other animal trainers as cruel, abusive, tec. (This has always been her line – that only Pat Derby knows how to treat animals.)
There was going to be a multiple lawsuit, but eventually Ralph, because of his long friendship with Ted withdrew, but fired both Derbys. (They said they left because of suit)
Pete Batten, formerly Director of San Jose Zoo. Helped Derbys on and off until the final breakup of the orphanage in Buellton, at which time he did the hardest thing of all – he put down all the animals which could not be placed elsewhere. I was with him – Pat would not accompany him, instead remained in the little ‘kitchen’ screaming about the poor animals – the animals that died because money to keep them and the land had been used for her personal gain.
Mrs. Beverly Coburn (then Mrs. James Coburn)
Donated monkeys and caging, plus support when Orphans of the Wild was opened. After the bankruptcy (see narrative) she continued to make donations, but stopped when Pat told her to ignore her (Bs) managers directions and make the donations larger.
The most important people backing the Derbys when the park contract was cancelled and Orphans of the Wild was organized, were General and Mrs. Pierpont Morgan-Hamilton, both noted for philanthropies, including human movements such as Seeing Eye Dogs, etc. Nora has remarried, now Mrs. King Straus. The General, I believe has passed away.
I hesitate to mention them – Nora was very bitter about the entire affair. The Hamiltons had, beside generous donations and acting Directors, had guaranteed to meet any shortfall, particularly with regard to mortgage payments. The 300 valuable acres had been sold to the Derbys at a very reduced price, with a guarantee that every consideration would be taken to help them maintain the animals. Very few, if any, mtg payments had been made, nor were made until in 1974 the lien holders foreclosed.
The Hamiltons also arranged a contract with the San Diego Zoo for the Derbys to produce a ‘Wild Animal Show’ with an extremely generous salary suggested by Mrs. Hamilton. The shows were tremendously successful – but very little of that income, including the fact that the show animals were boarded free of charge, was ever directed to payment of any bills including animal care.
The Hamiltons not only withdrew support when it was found that no money had been paid on the mortgage, building of animal facilities had halted, and the old ranch house was being expensively renovated.
They caused a bankruptcy to be declared. The animals were to be sold unless a sum of $10,000 was paid.
We did two fund-raising shows and I did a lot of publicity trying to regain trust. The non-profit Ootw was no longer in business.
I don’t know where Pat got the money but the $10,000* was paid and they started over again. [I had left the Derbys in the fall of 1972 when I became very angry about the misuse of funds – at the same time Betty Hayes also left.
I did not see the Derbys again for three months at which time Pat called me begging me to help pick up the pieces and try to overcome the failure and continue in spite of not being able to offer tax incentives.
Betty Hayes Endicott (I’ve lost touch, but you may find her through the Screen Actors Guild – stuntwoman and character actress – last job I know of she was stand-in for Pernell Roberts in Trapper John)
Betty was ranch manager for Orphans of the Wild in Buellton from late 1971-until fall 1972, when we both decided there was too much lack of integrity. She, like all of us who were on the so-called board of directors, was very disturbed by Pat’s misuse of donations to the non-profit corporation. She did the books, and was aware of all transactions. She, the Johnsons and I frequently talked about leaving, but always hoped we or someone could make Pat understand that donations to animals cannot be used to buy new cards, clothes, or antique furniture.
There are several other names, but, like the above were so very hurt and disgusted that I don’t want to give you without their permission, and if they request, promise they will not have to appear in court. I talk to them as soon as I can react them. Download the original letters about Pat Derby below.
The California based Performing Animal Welfare Society has been active in ant-circus efforts since its founding. An argument might be made that PAWS is less a true liberationist group or welfare society and more of personal fiefdom for founder and former Hollywood animal trainer Pat Derby. Like PeTA, PAWS has enjoyed significant success with direct mail fund raising. In fact donations have allowed have allowed PAWS to become significant property owners both around their original "sanctuary" in Galt , CA and the Sierra foothills where they have acquired more 2000 acres for a larger animal compound.
The National Farm Medicine Center studied one typical rural medical center over a two year period in 1994 and 1995 and reported 74 cases of horse related injures requiring in-patient treatment in a single community with a population of fewer than 59,000 people. In contrast in the two hundred years since the first elephant was exhibite d in America even the Performing Animal Welfare Society, reports only 120 approximate injuries directly or indirectly linked to elephant accidents -- with fewer than half of these accidents involving spectators at the circus. Sixty elephant related circus spectator injuries in 200 years in all of the United States versus 74 horse related injuries in 24 months in one rura l area with less than 59,000 people -- it's amazing that PAWS isn't su ggesting the closure of every stable in the United States . Moreover while PAWS reminds us that OSHA deems working with elephants to be a "dangerous occupation," they suggest that elephants will thrive in shelters, operations frequently staffed by volunteers with no professional experience and little training. If elephants are so dangerous in the circus by virtue of the fact that they are wild animals, then why aren't they equally dangerous when housed at the PAWS "sanctuary?"
"Because elephants are uniformly mistreated in circus training and they're forced to perform," they tell us. And where's the evidence to support that? Elephant related accidents are relatively rare, and when they do occur those accidents are as likely to happen in a zoo (where the animals don't perform) as they are in a circus.
PAWS likes to trumpet violations of USDA Animal Welfare Act standards by circuses traveling with elephants, but a look at the actual violations cited reveals that most of these violations were minor,
not unlike the several violations racked up by Pat Derby s own sanctuary in Galt.
Animal People further reminds usin their archives that PAWS Executive Director Derby lost a multi-million dollar libel judgement in August 1990 in a Nevada lawsuit brought by orangutan trainer Bobby Berosini. Derby was named in that suit along with PETA and others. Although the verdict was overturned upon appeal, apparently the 1990 jury decided that Derby and other activists weren't credible sources for information.
In recent years PAWS and Ms Derby have enjoyed some successes in "acquiring" elephants from Ringling Bros, in settlement for an ill-conceived espionage effort against the animal rights group, and from the San Francisco Zoo, which bowed to pressure for liberationist group nd city council to give up its animals. How will the elephants do under Derby s care? One zoo elephant has already been euthenized, according to Derby from the long term effects of captivity. Given her record one can t be sure that that "bull" will be the only casualty. Derby rarely mentions how in her days as a trainer and operator of a roadside zoo in Buellton , CA another elephant in her care died in a barn fire. PAWS would probably say, "at least it wasn t the circus."
1984: marked the year the organization started animal rescue efforts.
Rexano writes in their article Hypocritical Exotic and Wild Animal Sanctuaries: "There are too many exotic and wild animal "sanctuary/rescue" animal owners with questionable past or present. They try to ban the innocent, legal, loving and presently legal, responsible, private exotic/wild animal owners in order to deflect the attention from themselves and their irresponsible ways.
These people are hypocrites, they want to keep their exotic pets and getting public donations for them, while pushing for the legislation/laws that would ban others (the responsible people) from doing the same. These are the HYPOCRITICAL ANIMAL RESCUES or SANCTUARIES or whatever their latest name change might be. "
While critizising zoos and circuses, it seems to me that Pat Derby failed in her profession as animal trainer, and choose to take a short-cut, marketing herself as a animal heroine, and trying to make working life more difficault for her previous competitors, by critizising them publically, as well as paying lawyers to harass people. All those money, as far as I can understand, came from public donations:
2003-09: In September 2003, the 51 years old Asian female Tamara was euthanised.
2003: The following figures of the PAWS animal industry are from 2003: Derby makes $36,416, plus housing on the Galt sanctuary grounds, while Stewart, as secretary and treasurer, makes exactly $1 less. PAWS had a net worth of more than $3.5 million while spending more than $1.7 million per year. The land value of its three sanctuaries is about $6 million, but the organization owes $1.6 million in mortgages to five lenders.
2005-03: In March 2005, the 39 years old Asian female Tinkerbelle,was euthanaised, Tinkerbelle arrived in November 2004.
2008-04: In April 2008, the 56 years old Asian female Winky (Winkie) Winky arrived in August 2005.
2010-10-08: The elephant bull Sabu arrives at PAWS, who wrote in their 2010 newsletter: Prince and Sabu, both retired performing elephants, are in good health so we expect them to be with us for a very long time. In this newsletter is also mentioned a very cool and rainy spring.
2010: $1.8 million in donations received in 2010.
2011: was the final year PAWS hosted an open house at its 30-acres
sanctuary in Galt after opening the new facility in San Andreas.
2012-01-11: Sabu, the latest arrived elephant, collapsed in his sleeping stall early Wednesday at ARK 2000 in San Andreas, and and was euthanised according to PAWS due to "severe arthritis in multiple joints.". What PAWS did not tell was that already in 2000 Sabu tested positive for TB (Tuberculosis). The U.S. Department of Agriculture also found that two other elephants that died at PAWS within the past two years also tested positive for TB, according to necropsy reports. PAWS says the cause of death in both cases was not TB, but arthritis.
2012-01-16: On my blog I comment on Sabus death, and among other things, ask the question if it is logical to only see a TB infected location holder, pretty up north in west coast north America, as the single only place where Torontos elephants should live, just because a retired showman want to pay the transport of the elephants, if they come there, and can the defenition Sanctuary really be applied to a location holding with infected animals, carrying a chronic, lethal disease? Regardless of if they claim they have a TB quarantene? Is there, scientifically, an existing TB quarantene at PAWS?
I also reflected on wether the elephant stables really is a suitable playground for children and youths and if the youths and their parents also learned about the lethal zoonosis infection elephants from those stables are carrying? (See the picture below, with caption text)
JULY 29, 2012: Le PeTiT CiRqUe'S HUMANITARIAN cirque company of kids visited the Performing Animal Welfare Society's Incredible 23,000 sq.ft sanctuary and learned about the incredible animals they are performing for at the AVALON THEATRE on Sept-30. Since all of our productions are humanitarian based, the youths learned about these animals and where they were rescued from.
I also comment on the cold winter conditions at PAWS, and find it unprofessional to let the elephants walk in and out on their own decision:
An article written 2009 ago says: Nicholas, PAWS Asian bull elephant, walked outside for a few moments, but he obviously preferred a heated floor and very warm water for drinking to the beautiful, but frigid conditions in his outdoor habitat.
It is not known if PAWS are following the The AZA 40 degrees F rule. It seems like the elephants can choose as to stay inside or outside: "
2012-05-04: SPCA Australia starts a campaign, with ambition to get $500k in order to send the elephant Mila at Franklin Zoo and Wildlife Sanctuary, south of Auckland to PAWS, after Mila killed Franklin Zoo director Helen Schofield.
2012-10-26: The Board of Management of the Toronto Zoo received a letter from
the Performing Animal Welfare Society´s (PAWS) American attorneys
threatening legal action against the Toronto Zoo.
2013-02-15: Mrs Pat Derby died of throat cancer on Feb. 15 at the age of 69.
PAWS is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization. PAWS Fed ID # is 94-3005157.
You can probably find out more about this lucrative business!
In my mailbox a couple of days ago, was mail from a law firm in Boston, representing PAWS and Le Petit Cirque, with the subject:Cease and Desist: Defamatory Postings and Copyright Infringement. For anyone who never heard of PAWS (Performing Animals Welfare Society), its a "animal sanctuary" up in Galt, northern California, USA, owned by Pat Derby and Ed Stewart, and in spite of its impressing incomes, its refered to as a non-profit. Obviously some of their funding is used to pay lawyers: The mail I recieved from PAWS lawyers, contained a pdf document with the following:
Apart from a lot of irrelevant text masses in this document, comes the first written confirmation from PAWS that several of their elephants suffer from TB. The document does not only mention the elephant, but it says the elephantS that suffer from TB etc...
Obviously the lawyer doesnt have a clue what he is talking about. I guess, during his studies, that he never specialized in Tuberculosis, or how it can be diagnosed on elephants. He may be excused, and I also think hes doing his job, and need to earn his money. He probably believe that PAWS tell truth.
The people who gave money to PAWS, so PAWS can sue as many people they want, are also excused. They belive that they are doing something good, saving elephants and saving the world, by giving an organisation money, although the organsation wants more elephants to come to their TB-infected facility. Together with those elephants will also more money come. And more power.
PAWS are not, and can never be, excused. They must, or should know, that within their group of elephants, maybe, or rather probably, all elephants are infected, even if they can not confirm this by tests. All present elephants has during the years been mixed with each other, and two has been TB positive during autopsy. Tuberculosos is known to be carried away over distances, and in The Elephant Sanctuary, where they argued that the founder Carol Buckley kept "the highest standard" etc in the TB monitoring, some years later 9 of the TES staff tested positive, including 3 from administration building. Shortly after this, Mrs Buckley was dismissed from TES.
The owners of PAWS, as well as Mrs Julie Woodyer from ZooCheck Canada, and Toronto Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, (who according to some sources may have a background as animal rights activist and associated with ZooCheck) are the only people I can find that claim that PAWS elephants are free of TB. None of those three persons, to my knowledge, are veterinarians.
Julie Woodyer is against zoos in general, and has been campaigning many years to move Canadas elephants to any of the TB infected sanctuaries in U.S.A, which gives an interesting indication about how much she in reality care for those elephants healths. Here she says "I would recommend Sumac to charities large and small
who
want an easy transition and a user friendly database that will meet all
of your fundraising needs." Without fundrasing ZooCheck Canada wouldnt exist, and in order to get fundings, ZooCheck must exploit animals in a way, so people gets motivated to send them money.
Berardinetti, more or less repeats Julie and PAWS words like a parrot, and pretend for the Toronto citizens that she is some sort of elephant expert, and PAWS, as owner of a sanctuary which is a BIG money industry, does not want their sanctuary to be closed down from public visitors.
Those three people, has to my knowledge, not found one single veterinarian, having insight on elephant TB, that back up their personal ideas about TB on elephants. From my point of view, its totally amazing, that the local Police does not move their butts into their vehicles, drive to TB-infected sanctuaries like this, ask for the keys to the gate, and close them completely for visitors.
Any person with common knowledge of animals, would understand that this is not a place to send healthy elephants. A person with minor intellectual capacity, would understand that its not a suitable playground for children. And that parents to those children have any reason to be upset, if, or when they get information that their children has been inside elephants stables, on a location where animals possibly suffer from Tuberculosis and that at least 2 elephants during the last 2 years tested positive.
Le Petit cirque is a pretty unknown organisation to me, why I will wait to discuss them.
All I can say is that I saw the picture with their performers playing around in PAWS elephants stables, which for many reasons doesnt seem to be the best place, in July this year!!
And should the elephant stables really be a playground for children and youths?
JULY 29, 2012: Le PeTiT CiRqUe'S
HUMANITARIAN cirque company of kids visited the Performing Animal
Welfare Society's Incredible 23,000 sq.ft sanctuary and learned about
the incredible animals they are performing for at the AVALON THEATRE on
Sept-30. Since all of our productions are humanitarian based, the youths
learned about these animals and where they were rescued from Did the youths and their parents also learned about the lethal zoonosis infection elephants from those stables are carrying? Only hours later, PAWS lawyer send me the mail with the letter above. The lawyer is not only refering to the lines about my worries for the children and youths health situation, but also asking me to remove text concearning PAWS from my websites. I guess they are refering to the following:
After my blog in January 2012 it is now confirmed that 2 U.S. elephant "sanctuaries" are now Tuberculosis infected, The elephant sanctuary in Tennessee, and PAWS in northern California. PAWS want more elephants, so their funds from the public can increase! Please search as much information you can find regarding the planned translocation of 3 healthy african elephants from Toronto Zoo to PAWS "elephant sanctuary" in NORTHERN California. The picture shows Nicholas, PAWS Asian bull elephant, walking in the snow. It is not known if PAWS are following the The AZA 40 degrees F rule. It seems like the elephants can choose as to stay inside or outside. Last year the Bull Sabu died, officially of "severe arthritis", however PAWS in their newsletter wrote one year before: Prince and Sabu, both retired performing elephants, are in good health so we expect them to be with us for a very long time. In this PAWS newsletter it also mentioned a very cool and rainy spring. PAWS and ZooCheck Canada have tried to hide that Sabu was also suffering from Tuberculosis. The U.S. Department of Agriculture also found that two other elephants that died at PAWS within the past two years also tested positive for [tuberculosis] TB, according to necropsy reports. Please sign the petition asking Toronto City Council, to terminate the Agreement with PAWS, and let professionals decide about Toronto elephants whereabouts!
PAWS is also closely associated with the animal rights people who are against zoos, and plan to setup an "elephant sanctuary" in europe, which, if it comes to reality, also will be dependant on funding from AR people for its existence, and maybe using "Noble Cause Corruption" methods.
I guess many people would be scared if they got a document like the one above, with threats sent from a lawyer. I was puzzled for some days, and decided that Im not, and will never be scared of people that are trying to hide facts, and scare critical people to be quiet. Especially if they are red haired, and looks like they have problems of moving their body because of their body weight.
This woman may have rich people giving her money, but they will never have so much so they can buy my silence. And Im sorry, but I worked a couple of animals with larger teeth than her lawyers...
This is not the first time that PAWS is engaged in law suits, contrary, this seems to be an important part of their activities. "PAWS continues to waste its contributors' money pursuing ridiculous litigation," said Stockton attorney Dean Ruiz, representing two clients who won a case against PAWS last year. "If I was a donor, I'd want my money back."
In 2002, PAWS spent $67,000 in legal fees, according to its income tax return.
The following figures of the PAWS animal industry are from 2003: Derby makes $36,416, plus housing on the Galt sanctuary grounds, while Stewart, as secretary and treasurer, makes exactly $1 less. PAWS had a net worth of more than $3.5 million while spending more than $1.7 million per year. The land value of its three sanctuaries is
Yes, you read right, In 2002, PAWS spent $67,000 in legal fees, according to its income tax return.
In one lawsuit, PAWS sued John Ham, who lives on property next door to ARK 2000 west of San Andreas, Ham's friend, Kevin Krantz, and Frank Eckblom, publisher of the Calaveras County Daily News, in 2002, claiming that they defamed and harassed PAWS.
However, in September 2002, David L. DeVore, a visiting judge from Alpine County, threw out the lawsuit, saying that Ham, Krantz and Eckblom were exercising their First Amendment rights regarding a public matter. PAWS still owes Ham and Krantz about $7,000 in court and legal costs, and it owes Eckblom about $10,000, said Ruiz, who represents Ham and Krantz.
"We're still awaiting payment on the attorney fees order," Ruiz, said.
"People who send us donations continue to do so," Derby said. "People who join PAWS and donate to PAWS believe in what we do."
I have been thinking on the person that did such a thing, using the money from her supporters, in order to rush to a laywer, in order to try to scare me to be silent, obviously a habit of hers.
Not everyone has that sort of golden pockets, so they can make use of laywers as an argument and it becomes very clear, that all the money is from PAWS supporters, and that Pat Derby realized an alternative way to exploit animals, which gives less work, than working as an animal trainer.
Some questions arise:
Why is their organisation not transparent?
Why are they attacking zoos and circuses?
Why are they attacking their neighburs?
Why are they trying to scare me with their lawyers?
What do they hide?
In my next blog: Read more about Pat Derby and what people who know her past has stated reagarding Pat Derbys poor competence as animal trainer, critizising her
total lack of welfare for animals in her posession, as well as privately
taking money away from shared bank accounts with other persons os
companies.
Sri
Lanka is an island with a land area of approximately 65,610 km2
situated in the Indian Ocean, 35 km from the southern end of the Indian
Peninsula. There are 501 protected areas
in Sri Lanka. Protected areas in Sri Lanka accounts for 26.5 percent of
total area.This is a higher percentage of protected areas than in all
of Asia and much of the World. According to Wikipedia, between 1990 and
2000, Sri Lanka lost an average of 26,800 ha of forests per year.This
amounted to an average annual deforestation rate of 1.14 percent .
Between 2000 and 2005 this accelerated to 1.43% per annum.
The first-ever nationwide elephant census in August 2011
produced a total of 5,879 jumbos across the island, of those, only 122 elephants were tuskers. (Source) Some
environmentalists were unhappy with
the methodology and questioned its results. But even imperfect data can
inspire more systematic conservation measures. 70 per cent of Sri
Lanka's wild elephants are not in protected areas.
Human-elephant
conflict has transcended from just being a wildlife
management problem to one of the worst environmental and rural social
economic crises in Sri Lanka's Dry Zone (Source)
In Sri Lanka nearly 120 wild elephants are killed by humans and in
return about 65 people die after being attacked by elephants every year.
It seems most of those elephants are males, possibly who goes into
farmed areas in search for rich food, before, or during their musth
period.
A europan organisation that has been involved with elephants in Sri Lanka, is Austrian Sri Lankan elephant research and conversation project (ASERC) which was founded by the vice director at the Vienna Zoo in Austria, Dr. Harald Schwammer in 2005.ASERCgives
financial aid to the elephant care centres in Sri Lanka and supports
with experts in the veterinarian and management sector. In addition ASERCprovides a better education for local people and children in schools, but above all to make better contact with local farmers.
In 2007: Sri Lanka Wild Life Conservation Department sources revealed that over
the last 15 years, 1,850 elephants, 1,192 of them, male, had been
reported killed.(Source) A number of tragical train accidents also results in elephants dying, but the total annual number is not high.
Meantime,
according to Department of Wildlife Conservation (DWC), a number of
juvenile elephants been illegally captured in Asirigama for
domestication:
"DWC has in its custody at its Anuradhapura Office a baby elephant
which had allegedly been illegally captured for domestication by still
unidentified people who on hearing that the DWC was on their trail
abandoned it close to Asirigama in the Palugaswewa area. When DWC officials set
up a cordon, on hearing of the attempt to smuggle the baby elephant from
the Asirigama area, the culprits had tied the baby to a tree in the
scrub jungle leaving a few water melons by its side, before making good
their escape, it is understood. They may have been
planning to come back when the heat was off, a DWC source said, adding
that the baby is a female of about one and a half years. It may have
been illegally captured by either killing the mother or when it fell
into a waterhole in the jungle. Many conservationists
were of the view that the Asirigama area is notorious for alleged
attempts to illegally capture baby elephants. The modus operandi seems
to be to capture babies and then introduce them as having been born to
captive cow-elephants, they said". (Source)
On July 24 and 25 2004, Sri Lankan newspapers
reported the spotting
of a white (albino) elephant in Yala National Park, Sri Lanka, a female
named Sue, short for Sudu-Aliya" which means "white elephant". Although
this was the first time that this had received wide publicity,
Dr. Prithiviraj Fernando had observed this animal as a newborn in
Heenwewa in 1993. In 1996 the same animal had been photographed in water
by a group of enthusiasts. Sudi is mostly a light tan color with white
body hair but has a black tail tuft. Therefore, she is not a complete
albino. Source: The White Elephant
Captive elephants in Sri Lanka
Small Perahera in Rambukkana, 2012
In 2008 the captive elephant population consisted of 137 elephants, of which only 27 were tuskers.
The annual Perahera in Kandy, which dates back nearly 220 years, is celebrated July-August each year, where many of the captive elephants can be seen. Another important Perahera is the annual Nawam Maha Perahera at Gangaramaya Temple in Colombo which is held in Februari.
The Elephant Orphanage in Pinnawala has recorded the highest number
of elephant births in 2011, according to the statistics of the
Department of National Zoological Gardens. During the year, 15 elephant
calves were born and nine of them were males. Apart from the breeding project in Pinnawela, the breeding of
captive elephants in Sri Lanka seems to be low, a report speaks about only three captive born baby elephants outside Pinnawela..
The Department of National Zoological Gardens has earned Rs. 651
million during 2011, the highest on record. The income came from earnings
from the Dehiwala Zoo (Rs. 163 million), Elephant Orphanage, Pinnawela
(Rs 487 million) and Rs.16 million from other sources. More than 1. 6
million locals and 20,000 had visited the Dehiwela Zoo in 2011 while
around 400,000 locals and around 2.4 million foreigners had had visited
the elephant orphanage (Source)
Sri Lanka's tourist arrivals hit a record high in
December 2011, with 97,517 tourists arriving in the island, the data released
by the Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority (SLTDA) The month has recorded a 15.2 percent increase in
arrivals compared to December 2010 while the number of arrivals in 2011
increased by 30.8 percent over the previous year. (Source)
![[Image0003.JPG]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2AdYESZ86EaemHmTWuf5L0LASBAtaHcEUyUIJjTMvP_zNd6-mdoV8mCBQpuExnKTdnT7-hgk7KQ_A8xvK4gaCXttN3VnTGxOYhLJHGVTrjXKCMjgzDy63HSCyznkR9-6VZcCib7PUIYMw/s640/Image0003.JPG)
